Aryans were neither
Germans nor Iranians. They were the descendants of Koli / Kalchuris/ Kalbhra
kings who came from Kalinga (Orissa) with a special purpose for spreading
Buddism. They had matrimonial alliance with the orthodox Brahmins of that area and thus a new
race was formed known as Aryans. Lord Budda was born in this new race. Budda’s
mother Maha maya and wife yesodhara were from Koli warrior and fishing
community.
The word Aryan is a pure
Sanskrit word which means noble or spiritual. Budda was also referred as Arayar
in Tamil literature. The word Arayan, Arayar, Araya etc; are found in various
places with their other forms and have been used both as nouns and adjectives.
From the description of Pathittrupath, it can be seen that Arayar are the kings
of the north Rishis of Himalayas. The castes Araiyar, Arayan,
Arayars,Mutharayars in Tamilnadu and Kerala are the sub castes of Muthurajas/ Mudirajas who are the descendants of Koli/ Kalchuris/Kalabhra kings. Arayar of kerala have
been claiming that they are “Araya Brahmins” since time immemorial. The king
Chenkuttuva was an Arayan because, he was a buddist ruler. The world famous epic
“Chilappathikaram was written by Ilango Adi Arayan who was the younger brother of
the king Chenkuttuva. Kannaki, the heroin of the Chilappathikaram was an Araya
woman from kaveryppattanam of Chola kingdom.
Arya (singular),Aryas
(plural) Aryas>Aryars>Arayars >Araiyars>Ariyars the buddist
referred to any respectable member of the Buddist Sangha as Arya and it appears that usage of Arya was
common throughout the Buddist world. Buddism was growing up during that time. But, the Dravida "Brahmins"who were seperated from the newly formed religion began to destroy them. Lord Budda was suffered too much bitter things by this Brahmins.This Brahmins were also declared that the Aryans were aliens.
The kings of south
India like the Chola and Pandya dynasties relate their lineages back to Manu.
The Matsya purana more over makes Manu, the progenitor of all the Aryas,
originally a south Indian King Sathyavrita. The kings of the kingdom of Jaffna
are known by the name of Arya chakravartis. According to others, Jayabahu who
ruled the North while Magha ruled from Polonnaruwa was probably the founder of
the Arya rulers of the North. These rulers were originally a branch of the
Ganga dynasty from KALINGA who had immigrated to Rameswaram, south India who
had intermingled with the Brahmins of the area. It was to highlight their
connection with the highest caste that they had called themselves Aryas.
India, in the Puranas is divided into
Pancha Dravida (Five Southern Provinces) and Pancha Gauda (Five Northern
Provinces). Pancha Dravida ('Dravidian or South') also includes Gujarat and
Maharashtra - which are Indo-Aryan (IE) speaking states.
So, to categorize Aryans as Indo European (IE) speakers and Dravidians as merely Dravidian speakers, or people, is incorrect.
These were the Two Groups of Vedic Brahmins – the Saraswats, Kanyakubjas, Utkals, Gaudas, and Maithalas to the North and Gujaras, Maharastras, Andhras, Kaernatas and Dravidas to the South.
It should also be noted most Dravida Brahmins belong to the Taittiriya Samhita (Yajur Veda) and Rig Veda schools – which are the oldest schools of the Vedas –s showing them more or less as older more preservative peoples and survivors of earliest Vedic cultures – rather than reformed by Aryans.
Manu (the first Aryan) in Bhagavata Purana (VIII.24.13) is stated to have been a King from the Dravida province who sailed north to avoid the floods, and to whom the Matysa (fish) incarnation of Vishnu appeared to (even in Shatapatha Brahmana).
Rig Veda (the oldest 'Aryan' text) states that Rishis (Seers or Immortal Saints) called Agastya and Vasishta also sailed from a flood, and were sons of Water-God Varuna (Gk. Ouranos).
Manu in the Vedas is Vaivasvata (Solar Manu) who sailed from the flood to Himalayas. His daughter is Ila. Now - the text Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (VI.4.28) calls Ila as 'Maitravaruni' meaning 'daughter of Mitra (Sun) and Varuna (Waters)'- showing she is cognate to both Satyavrata and Vaivasvata and connects the two, and shows the first 'Aryans' or Vedic people came from Southern Indian practices.
Texts as Vishnu Purana and Ramayana also tell us of another King Satyavrata, also known as Trishanku, of whom Seer Vishvamitra gave bodily accession into a heaven the Seer himself created, since he had become an outcaste and Indra rejected him.
This seems related to a flood tale, and also a tale of “New Lands” created from the old lands of Indra, which is perhaps the North and South. Vishvamitra’s Heaven is perhaps the Sarasvati region, and Satyavrata the new King.
Satyavrata is descended from the Solar Dynasty of India and was father of Harischandra.
Moreover – Ilavarta is the name of ancient Vedic India, ‘The Land of Ila’. Similarly, the land that was sunken in Southern Indian traditions is called Ilam or Ilavar (also the name for Sri Lanka, which – interestingly, Semitic peoples see as the Garden of Eden) – and thus correlates the Vedic tale, Bhagavata tale and Dravidian tales as the same – and proves the first “Aryans” were migrants from the South from this same land.
Now, in addition Agastya is also a S. Indian patron Saint, who saved the Agama texts in the South (who are based on Brahmana or ritualistic section of Vedas, and also found in Kashmir to the North (again IE speakers – in-fact Alpine and Nordic races!). Southern Agastya also sailed from a flood around Mahabalipuram (region where Graham Hancock has managed to find ruins, perhaps dateable to c.7500BCE).
Vasishtha is also credited with the creation of the Mahamrityunjaya (great death victory mantra) in Rig Veda (VII.59.12) to Lord Shiva. Agastya is Shiva's main Seer in the South, and hence correlates both Northern and Southern cultures. More or less, instead of Arya and Dravida, they are 'Northern Arya and Southern Arya' cultures.
It should also be stated here that the land of Mahabalipuram was ruled by the tyrannical king Bali of Kerala. He was a descendant of demon Virochana (mentioned in Chandogya Upanishad as being a materialist as opposed to Indra) and himself son of Prahlada – the devotee of Vishnu, of whom the Man-Lion (Narasimha) incarnation came about because.
Prahlada’s father (Hiranyakshipu), Bali and Virochana all ruled the region from Gujerat down to Kerala and Southern India as Tamil Nadu (as Mahabalipuram shows) – and all had Vedic (Aryan) Gurus – Brighus. More specifically, the Ushaneya or Kavya recession of Bhargava Seers that included Shukracharya or Asuramaya (Ushanas Kavya) himself. He is Planet Venus and also Planet of Materialism.
This begins to show a pattern emerging showing the Southern Aryans or ‘Dravidians’ (including both Gujara, Maharashtra Indo-Aryan speakers) as originally a materialistic breakaway of Brighu Seers – as Virochana’s reverence of body as self in Chandogya also shows – and Manu states as ‘fallen kshatriya’ tribes.
Now, the Kaushitaki Upanishad (III.1) states that Indra killed the peoples of Prahlada – meaning his demonic ancestors such as his father, aunt and others that tried to kill him. It thus relates Indra with Narasimha – and shows that these people were Vedic people themselves!
All of this shows that Dravidians were Aryans and Vedic people – the first Vedic people.
As Tamil Nadu is associated with Rishi Agastya of the Vedas – we note Andhra is associated with Brighu Rishi with the Sri Vaishnava tradition of Tirupati, and Kerala was founded by Vedic Rishi Rama Bhargava – one of the sons of one of the Vedic Sapta Rishis – Jamadagni!
So, we can either say Dravidian Seers were the first of Vedic peoples and Seers, or that Aryans or Vedic people came from the Southern Lands – both corrupt lands to escape demonic rulership, and also escape natural calamities as tsunamis, floods and earthquakes – just as Vedic people in the Indus-Sarasvati region did.
Moreover, the 'Dravidian' languages of Southern India are also representative of more or less the 'Rig Vedic Sanskrit' dialectics rather than unrelated tongues. In fact - Dravidian tongues like Tamil are closer tto Sanskrit than modern IE languages such as Hindi!
Scholars as V. Keerthi Kumar have shown how Indo-European and Dravidian have more or less a common heritage, and how the latter is closer to proto-Indo-European (or Rig Vedic Sanskritic dialects).
In addition, Swami Chandrasekharendra Saraswati in his “Hindu Dharma” states how ancient Rig Vedic inflections and sounds become more apparent in so-called Dravidian tongues, and have been preserved more than in the North.
It should also be noted N.Jha and NS Rajaram have recently proved the Indus-Seals to be representative of an early stage of the Old Brahmi script (found in Dvaraka before Ashoka). The Brahmi script was used for writing Sanskrit in ancient India and is basis for both Northern and Southern Indian scripts – showing also that they both had more or less the same culture.
Once again – South Indian variants of Brahmi have remained closer in shapes to the originals – whereas Northern variants as Devanagari have changed somewhat (like classical Sanskrit and modern languages such as Hindi).
We should also, note the first to last Seers of Vedanta schools and Vedic reformers all came from the South! Shankaracharya (c.500BCE), his Gurus Gaudapada and Govinda Jati, were also (around 600BCE). Shankara reformed Advaita (non-dualism) and destroyed Buddhism's influence before the Greek Invasion by Alexander.
Kerala, where Shankara came from, is also where Ayurveda (Indian Medicine) and Dhanurveda (Martial Arts) - Vedic sciences now lost mostly in India, still survives - showing an older preservative tradition as Shankara did with the Vedas and their Vedanta doctrine. Bodhidharma (Buddhist Saint who took Dhanurveda to China under Chán [Dhyana] Buddhism perhaps also hailed from the region). Shankara was in lineage from Dakshinamurti (Soma, a form of Shiva) and Vyasa (author of Upanishads and Puranas - contemporary of Krishna c.3200BCE).
The next, Ramanuja of Vishvadvaita was also a S. Indian, from the Vedic Brighu lineage. Madhavacharya of Dvaita or Dualism school was from the South and in lineage of the Vedic creator-god, Brahma. Nimbarkacharya in lineage from the Sun (Surya). Vallabha from Agni or Rudra (Shiva as Vedic Fire God). All came from Southern India.
Sayanacharya around 14th century, a great commentator on Rig Veda, also came from South India - as did Ganapati Muni about a century ago, who reformed the Tantra-Veda correlations and many other things. He was a disciple of the great Ramana Maharishi - his name well known in the West.
As far back as epic Ramayana (at least 1000 years before Krishna and thus c.4200BCE) - Hanuman and S. Indians practiced Vedic culture, and Seers as Agastya existed then - showing there was never any difference between the peoples.
If Aryans Invaded around 1500BCE - then why are elaborate cities such as Lothal and Dholavira (3000BCE), Dvaraka (1500BCE), later Ganga Valley Civilizations around 1200BCE onwards existant- and are built according to dates of Krishna and in same regions? They also have Vedic Fire altars etc. in the cities, and the Indus cites themselves are described as per Rig Veda (if they only looked) and built according to the Vedic Shilpa rules!
Moreover, we presented the approximate date of 7500BCE for earlier ruins of cities under the Gujerat Coast and S. Indian coastal regions. Which is also where the floods were (and Krishna's city was also found submerged from 1500BCE onwards and earlier).
The Greeks in the time of Alexander stated that the Indian Puranas (then, some 2,300 years ago) said there were about 6000 years between Dionysus (Deva-Nahusha an ancient King who became a serpent and also took Indra's throne for a while) and Alexander. Thus, 6000+300 years and today we are in 2005 gives us 8305 years for Indian Civilisation and Aryas in India.
If scholars don't believe the Puranas, then we see from Greek records how 'traditional' India has been. Megasthenes in 300BCE states names of the tribes along the Gujerat coast as (in Greek inflections, of course), Surasenoi (Surasena), Herakles as the deity (Hare-Krishna) and two cities called Methora (Mathura) and Kleisobora (Krishnapura) - which are their names today, some 2,300 years later. We cannot even say 12th Century names in Europe still survive!
We see the ruins around 7500BCE so 8,300 years is not that far of 9,500 or so years, and hence shows these cities predate Nahusha, one of the oldest Indian Kings as per the Greeks. Nahusha was a king in the lunar dynasty, and there were many Nahushas. Early King lists sometimes use one personality's name to denote up to 1000 years of their successors.
At any rate, it dismisses the Aryan Invasion Theory and also the Arya-Dravida divide.
Our traditional scholars from Dayananda Sarasvati of the Arya Samaj and the opld school Vedic orthodoxy to Vedic and Hindu scholars such as Yogananda, Swami Vivekananda, Ganapati Muni, Sri Chandrasekharendra Sarasvati, former Shankaracharya of Kanchi Matha, Swami Shivananda and Sri Aurobindo – all rejected the Aryan Invasion Theory and Arya-Dravida divide.
So, to categorize Aryans as Indo European (IE) speakers and Dravidians as merely Dravidian speakers, or people, is incorrect.
These were the Two Groups of Vedic Brahmins – the Saraswats, Kanyakubjas, Utkals, Gaudas, and Maithalas to the North and Gujaras, Maharastras, Andhras, Kaernatas and Dravidas to the South.
It should also be noted most Dravida Brahmins belong to the Taittiriya Samhita (Yajur Veda) and Rig Veda schools – which are the oldest schools of the Vedas –s showing them more or less as older more preservative peoples and survivors of earliest Vedic cultures – rather than reformed by Aryans.
Manu (the first Aryan) in Bhagavata Purana (VIII.24.13) is stated to have been a King from the Dravida province who sailed north to avoid the floods, and to whom the Matysa (fish) incarnation of Vishnu appeared to (even in Shatapatha Brahmana).
Rig Veda (the oldest 'Aryan' text) states that Rishis (Seers or Immortal Saints) called Agastya and Vasishta also sailed from a flood, and were sons of Water-God Varuna (Gk. Ouranos).
Manu in the Vedas is Vaivasvata (Solar Manu) who sailed from the flood to Himalayas. His daughter is Ila. Now - the text Brihadaranyaka Upanishad (VI.4.28) calls Ila as 'Maitravaruni' meaning 'daughter of Mitra (Sun) and Varuna (Waters)'- showing she is cognate to both Satyavrata and Vaivasvata and connects the two, and shows the first 'Aryans' or Vedic people came from Southern Indian practices.
Texts as Vishnu Purana and Ramayana also tell us of another King Satyavrata, also known as Trishanku, of whom Seer Vishvamitra gave bodily accession into a heaven the Seer himself created, since he had become an outcaste and Indra rejected him.
This seems related to a flood tale, and also a tale of “New Lands” created from the old lands of Indra, which is perhaps the North and South. Vishvamitra’s Heaven is perhaps the Sarasvati region, and Satyavrata the new King.
Satyavrata is descended from the Solar Dynasty of India and was father of Harischandra.
Moreover – Ilavarta is the name of ancient Vedic India, ‘The Land of Ila’. Similarly, the land that was sunken in Southern Indian traditions is called Ilam or Ilavar (also the name for Sri Lanka, which – interestingly, Semitic peoples see as the Garden of Eden) – and thus correlates the Vedic tale, Bhagavata tale and Dravidian tales as the same – and proves the first “Aryans” were migrants from the South from this same land.
Now, in addition Agastya is also a S. Indian patron Saint, who saved the Agama texts in the South (who are based on Brahmana or ritualistic section of Vedas, and also found in Kashmir to the North (again IE speakers – in-fact Alpine and Nordic races!). Southern Agastya also sailed from a flood around Mahabalipuram (region where Graham Hancock has managed to find ruins, perhaps dateable to c.7500BCE).
Vasishtha is also credited with the creation of the Mahamrityunjaya (great death victory mantra) in Rig Veda (VII.59.12) to Lord Shiva. Agastya is Shiva's main Seer in the South, and hence correlates both Northern and Southern cultures. More or less, instead of Arya and Dravida, they are 'Northern Arya and Southern Arya' cultures.
It should also be stated here that the land of Mahabalipuram was ruled by the tyrannical king Bali of Kerala. He was a descendant of demon Virochana (mentioned in Chandogya Upanishad as being a materialist as opposed to Indra) and himself son of Prahlada – the devotee of Vishnu, of whom the Man-Lion (Narasimha) incarnation came about because.
Prahlada’s father (Hiranyakshipu), Bali and Virochana all ruled the region from Gujerat down to Kerala and Southern India as Tamil Nadu (as Mahabalipuram shows) – and all had Vedic (Aryan) Gurus – Brighus. More specifically, the Ushaneya or Kavya recession of Bhargava Seers that included Shukracharya or Asuramaya (Ushanas Kavya) himself. He is Planet Venus and also Planet of Materialism.
This begins to show a pattern emerging showing the Southern Aryans or ‘Dravidians’ (including both Gujara, Maharashtra Indo-Aryan speakers) as originally a materialistic breakaway of Brighu Seers – as Virochana’s reverence of body as self in Chandogya also shows – and Manu states as ‘fallen kshatriya’ tribes.
Now, the Kaushitaki Upanishad (III.1) states that Indra killed the peoples of Prahlada – meaning his demonic ancestors such as his father, aunt and others that tried to kill him. It thus relates Indra with Narasimha – and shows that these people were Vedic people themselves!
All of this shows that Dravidians were Aryans and Vedic people – the first Vedic people.
As Tamil Nadu is associated with Rishi Agastya of the Vedas – we note Andhra is associated with Brighu Rishi with the Sri Vaishnava tradition of Tirupati, and Kerala was founded by Vedic Rishi Rama Bhargava – one of the sons of one of the Vedic Sapta Rishis – Jamadagni!
So, we can either say Dravidian Seers were the first of Vedic peoples and Seers, or that Aryans or Vedic people came from the Southern Lands – both corrupt lands to escape demonic rulership, and also escape natural calamities as tsunamis, floods and earthquakes – just as Vedic people in the Indus-Sarasvati region did.
Moreover, the 'Dravidian' languages of Southern India are also representative of more or less the 'Rig Vedic Sanskrit' dialectics rather than unrelated tongues. In fact - Dravidian tongues like Tamil are closer tto Sanskrit than modern IE languages such as Hindi!
Scholars as V. Keerthi Kumar have shown how Indo-European and Dravidian have more or less a common heritage, and how the latter is closer to proto-Indo-European (or Rig Vedic Sanskritic dialects).
In addition, Swami Chandrasekharendra Saraswati in his “Hindu Dharma” states how ancient Rig Vedic inflections and sounds become more apparent in so-called Dravidian tongues, and have been preserved more than in the North.
It should also be noted N.Jha and NS Rajaram have recently proved the Indus-Seals to be representative of an early stage of the Old Brahmi script (found in Dvaraka before Ashoka). The Brahmi script was used for writing Sanskrit in ancient India and is basis for both Northern and Southern Indian scripts – showing also that they both had more or less the same culture.
Once again – South Indian variants of Brahmi have remained closer in shapes to the originals – whereas Northern variants as Devanagari have changed somewhat (like classical Sanskrit and modern languages such as Hindi).
We should also, note the first to last Seers of Vedanta schools and Vedic reformers all came from the South! Shankaracharya (c.500BCE), his Gurus Gaudapada and Govinda Jati, were also (around 600BCE). Shankara reformed Advaita (non-dualism) and destroyed Buddhism's influence before the Greek Invasion by Alexander.
Kerala, where Shankara came from, is also where Ayurveda (Indian Medicine) and Dhanurveda (Martial Arts) - Vedic sciences now lost mostly in India, still survives - showing an older preservative tradition as Shankara did with the Vedas and their Vedanta doctrine. Bodhidharma (Buddhist Saint who took Dhanurveda to China under Chán [Dhyana] Buddhism perhaps also hailed from the region). Shankara was in lineage from Dakshinamurti (Soma, a form of Shiva) and Vyasa (author of Upanishads and Puranas - contemporary of Krishna c.3200BCE).
The next, Ramanuja of Vishvadvaita was also a S. Indian, from the Vedic Brighu lineage. Madhavacharya of Dvaita or Dualism school was from the South and in lineage of the Vedic creator-god, Brahma. Nimbarkacharya in lineage from the Sun (Surya). Vallabha from Agni or Rudra (Shiva as Vedic Fire God). All came from Southern India.
Sayanacharya around 14th century, a great commentator on Rig Veda, also came from South India - as did Ganapati Muni about a century ago, who reformed the Tantra-Veda correlations and many other things. He was a disciple of the great Ramana Maharishi - his name well known in the West.
As far back as epic Ramayana (at least 1000 years before Krishna and thus c.4200BCE) - Hanuman and S. Indians practiced Vedic culture, and Seers as Agastya existed then - showing there was never any difference between the peoples.
If Aryans Invaded around 1500BCE - then why are elaborate cities such as Lothal and Dholavira (3000BCE), Dvaraka (1500BCE), later Ganga Valley Civilizations around 1200BCE onwards existant- and are built according to dates of Krishna and in same regions? They also have Vedic Fire altars etc. in the cities, and the Indus cites themselves are described as per Rig Veda (if they only looked) and built according to the Vedic Shilpa rules!
Moreover, we presented the approximate date of 7500BCE for earlier ruins of cities under the Gujerat Coast and S. Indian coastal regions. Which is also where the floods were (and Krishna's city was also found submerged from 1500BCE onwards and earlier).
The Greeks in the time of Alexander stated that the Indian Puranas (then, some 2,300 years ago) said there were about 6000 years between Dionysus (Deva-Nahusha an ancient King who became a serpent and also took Indra's throne for a while) and Alexander. Thus, 6000+300 years and today we are in 2005 gives us 8305 years for Indian Civilisation and Aryas in India.
If scholars don't believe the Puranas, then we see from Greek records how 'traditional' India has been. Megasthenes in 300BCE states names of the tribes along the Gujerat coast as (in Greek inflections, of course), Surasenoi (Surasena), Herakles as the deity (Hare-Krishna) and two cities called Methora (Mathura) and Kleisobora (Krishnapura) - which are their names today, some 2,300 years later. We cannot even say 12th Century names in Europe still survive!
We see the ruins around 7500BCE so 8,300 years is not that far of 9,500 or so years, and hence shows these cities predate Nahusha, one of the oldest Indian Kings as per the Greeks. Nahusha was a king in the lunar dynasty, and there were many Nahushas. Early King lists sometimes use one personality's name to denote up to 1000 years of their successors.
At any rate, it dismisses the Aryan Invasion Theory and also the Arya-Dravida divide.
Our traditional scholars from Dayananda Sarasvati of the Arya Samaj and the opld school Vedic orthodoxy to Vedic and Hindu scholars such as Yogananda, Swami Vivekananda, Ganapati Muni, Sri Chandrasekharendra Sarasvati, former Shankaracharya of Kanchi Matha, Swami Shivananda and Sri Aurobindo – all rejected the Aryan Invasion Theory and Arya-Dravida divide.
FRAWLEY'S PARADOX explains what kind of
shit is the ARYAN invasion theory is made of:
According to the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) the nomadic, warrior settlers from central Asia came into India around 2000 BC, drove the culturally superior Dravidians inhabiting the Indus valley Civilization. They had straight streets meeting at 90 degrees to each other, sophisticated bathing places with overhead water storage tanks and efficient drainage systems and they used standard brick sizes etc. - they had NO LITERATURE. On the other hand the gypsy tribals who arrived from Central Asia, had no sophisticated culture, but had enormous Sanskrit literature! David Frawley felt these two essential parts of Aryan Invasion Theory did not fit in! He wanted the protogonists of AIT to explain these two Paradoxes. This is called Frawley's Paradox, which disproves Aryan Invasion theory. The recent DNA studies, Archaeological, Literary and Historical studies prove there are no Aryans or Dravidians among us! We are one people!
According to the Aryan Invasion Theory (AIT) the nomadic, warrior settlers from central Asia came into India around 2000 BC, drove the culturally superior Dravidians inhabiting the Indus valley Civilization. They had straight streets meeting at 90 degrees to each other, sophisticated bathing places with overhead water storage tanks and efficient drainage systems and they used standard brick sizes etc. - they had NO LITERATURE. On the other hand the gypsy tribals who arrived from Central Asia, had no sophisticated culture, but had enormous Sanskrit literature! David Frawley felt these two essential parts of Aryan Invasion Theory did not fit in! He wanted the protogonists of AIT to explain these two Paradoxes. This is called Frawley's Paradox, which disproves Aryan Invasion theory. The recent DNA studies, Archaeological, Literary and Historical studies prove there are no Aryans or Dravidians among us! We are one people!
